The DVD Cover is More Interesting than the Movie
Compay | New Orleans, LA | 02/26/2010
(2 out of 5 stars)
"There's really no other way to sum it up, Red Hook is easily one of the least interesting horror movies I've seen in years. It's a scavenger hunt gone wrong, with a predictable ending. The writers attempt to misdirect the audience halfway through the movie to lead up to a twist ending, but they try a little too hard, making the conclusion obvious.
The film's production quality is poor, and the directing is below average. The cast does a decent job, as most were relatively experienced television actors. I have no idea why the word "unrated" was thrown on the cover, as the kill scenes will only make the average horror fan yawn. The only reason I gave the film two stars instead of one was because I enjoyed the movie's score.
I write this review with the understanding that anyone who worked on the movie will probably rate my review as "unhelpful", but I'm just being honest. I thought it was painfully boring, and I'd suggest that you at least rent it before buying the DVD."
So much better then the usual crappy horror that I have watc
N Eld | USA | 03/08/2010
(4 out of 5 stars)
"I thought this movie had a decent plot, and kept you interested in what was going to happen next. In the past few months I have seen the worst of Hollywood, and indies have to offer and I say this movie tried and succeeded in being interesting, keeping my attention, and did not have me yelling at my television demanding my money back!=o)"
Its not so bad
nik84 | mo | 09/06/2010
(3 out of 5 stars)
"By no means is this on my list of favorite horror movies, but it wasn't bad. It is fairly predictable but I didn't feel like it was a waste of time. The film quality is okay, the acting has some hits and misses, and there are a couple of good kills. The DVD cover is more menacing than the actual movie, but if you keep your expectations low, you might like this one."